The “rush to the bottom” of international tax rates may soon come to an end. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is working with 140 countries on a framework designed to level the playing field. Click through for a view of what taxes may look like in the future.
Countries around the globe are trying to stem the so-called “rush to the bottom,” which has multinational companies moving their corporate headquarters so they can lower their tax bills. Countries like Bermuda, the Cayman Islands and Ireland are some popular destinations for corporations looking for tax havens. The result of this tax strategy is a loss of worldwide government revenues estimated to be between $500 and $600 billion annually, according to the International Monetary Fund.
This issue of businesses shuffling their headquarters between countries is not new. It has made the headlines many times over the past 30 years or so, but the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have made it a front-page issue. With so many individuals and small businesses struggling economically, the public’s demand for fairer taxation has become part of the debate.
A significant driver of the international tax debate is the way digital services are taxed, especially the services provided by digital giants like Facebook, Amazon and Google. The existing laws never anticipated that data would be the revenue-creating behemoth that it is or that most of the global tech giants would be U.S. companies.
President Biden’s proposed Made in America Tax Plan seeks to ensure that corporations, including the digital giants, pay their fair share of taxes.
Some of the main features of the Biden plan that affect multinational companies include:
- Enacting country-by-country minimum tax rates on offshore assets. Currently, companies headquartered abroad deduct 50% of their foreign income from their tax burden and may claim a tax credit of 80% of their foreign tax payments, no matter how large or small those tax payments were. That means that a company that claims an address in a country with no corporate tax at all can simply halve its tax burden. Adding more tax brackets would level the playing field.
- Modifying or eliminating the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) provisions incentivizing the offshoring of assets. The proposed changes would eliminate the Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII) tax incentives and replace the Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT) with the Stopping Harmful Inversions and Ending Low-Tax Developments (SHIELD) tax.
Having international buy-in to a global minimum corporate tax is an important element of President Biden’s agenda. Currently, the OECD is overseeing a 140-nation effort to develop a framework for a new global minimum tax that would allow the countries where the sales are being made, rather than the one where the corporate headquarters are located, to get a bigger share of a corporation’s taxes. This is intended to prevent corporations from shifting profits from high-tax jurisdictions to lower-tax ones. Individual countries would rely on the OECD framework as they form their own tax legislation.
The OECD’s goal is to have its plan ready by July 2021. No one knows what the proposed tax rate will be or whether it will be adopted by the participating countries. The hope is that it will be the beginning of international cooperation for the taxation of multinational corporations.
The stakes are high for multinational corporations operating in the United States. If these changes are enacted, there would be a big change in how multinationals report profits and revenue, how they are taxed, and what their compliance requirements will be.
If you need assistance or have any questions related to the American Families Plan, or any other potential tax law changes, please call your CironeFriedberg professional. You can reach us by phone at 203-798-2721 (Bethel), 203-366-5876 (Shelton), or 203-359-1100 (Stamford), or email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.